What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
faraday hats
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it.
While faraday cage hats sounds like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who were distance from them.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals as well as the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for faraday cage hats that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.