Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?

Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.

They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

Have you ever used a cell phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower.

While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.

However,  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is because radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.


Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight.  https://telegra.ph/Will-be-5g-of-sugars-unhealthy-for-an-individual-03-26-2  of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.