Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever wandered through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can result in a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is.
While it sounds like something that's good however, people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were far from antennas.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In what is a safe distance from a cell tower is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.